The Doctrine of the Fathers and the anarcho-1 biocosmos
of Alexsandr Svjatogor
1. For us we have raised the banner of a new ideology, the history of anarchism in the revolution is especially interesting about his thinking. We will refer to the mainstream of thought, which is made in terms of two chronological phases.
In the first phase of this thought shows itself in debt without conditions with the Doctrine of the Fathers. Adheres to this doctrine completely and blindly. As a prisoner of tradition and it is uncritical monistic why you can use the concept of anarchism tier "as appropriate definition of this first phase uncritical.
The second phase, critical, was born because the immediate jump sank into anarchy. The harsh reality revolutionary (the rest can not otherwise be) forced to revise his father's legacy.
Both steps proved to be a part of the unsustainability of the Doctrine of the Fathers, on the other the unsustainability of anarchist thought as such. Following this entrance down a blind alley from which in our opinion only biocosmos indicates a way out.
2. The conflict of anarchist thought the revolution was a dispute over utopianism and realism. Of course, utopianism proved inconsistent. The revolution unloaded those advocating the teaching of the Fathers, especially with the prospect of a tactical shot. However, when one begins to question the tactics, of course we must also cast doubt on the theory. The thought
went on and until the ideology, and he had to admit that the doctrine "had put on his belly." And since it was neither a restoration nor a reform could be helpful. But the anarchist thought it was subjected to an authority in too strong at the expense of their creativity. In fact he could escape to their own doctrine in the weaknesses. But because of the weak and submissive wrecked in an attempt to get out of the impasse.
Revolution meant not only the bankruptcy of modern anarchist thought. It also means the end of anarchism history, because the new spirit can not settle for narrow concepts and survivors. In this way, the revolution meant the need for a new anarchism (in theory and practice). But overcoming the crisis, create a new concept and thus indicate the way out of the impasse can only do so who is independent and free from tradition by, those in their creation and in its axioms reveals revolutionary audacity. We propagate the
biocosmos - In opposition to contemporary anarchist thought, cowardly and weak - as a way of thinking resolute, bold and healthy, as a new concept in opposition to the doctrines of the past. Of course they had no great hope that the weak thought, even when he doubts the ancestors, talk to us accepting the biocosmos. To do this it is too unrealistic and presumptuous meanly. But we have every reason to hope that the anarchist forces fresh, healthy and strong, who have had the experience of the revolution, will turn to biocosmos, and they already made. 13.1
constructs of the old anarchism have not stood the test of fire of the revolution. But neither this nor any other fire can to focus and fire the key feature of life - the human personality living. If the buildings erected on this ideological base are destroyed in a fire, yet still stand the foundations for new buildings. At the same time stands on the site of collapsed buildings flooded with great, great development which meets the needs of time and, more importantly, the needs of the personality (and society). 14.1
new buildings require an extension of the base. The concept of personality is understood too narrowly in all the old anarchist conceptions. This restriction is a capital mistake of anarchist doctrines, for this reason these from the first day their lives were not stable internally and it was just a matter of time until their illusory nature was exposed. In the old anarchism
the problem of personality is not themed properly. Each design is based on a concept of personality too one-sided, superficial. Instead of personality has been given a vital socio-political person, selfish (Stiner) or altruistic (Godwin). So far, it is also found in pseudo-scientific way how small and insignificant is the man (Kropotkin). Or was conceived personality as dominating as destructive and if they have diminished the positive, creative. With not a word was at the base personality, but an abstraction of the unilateral character.
Personality is conceived in its stillness, in a small circle from life to death and not in the dynamism of the growth of his creative powers. In relation to the person's death was seen by all as very important anarchist (It is curious that the anarchist thought
protesting against the authorities, not to be raised against the authority of death). B personality was considered beyond the thrust deep into his immortality, and therefore beyond its real creativity. The old
anarchism had a positive of personality, but rather a negative one. Believed to affirm the personality, in fact you gave up and articulating its poor performances, darkened living man, left him in the dark and replaced it with an abstraction. To the extent that anarchism reduced the man while he neglected his personal destiny, led him to the individual and social catastrophe.
Herein lies the fundamental mistake - an error in the foundations - of all anarchist conceptions. The root was too skinny and therefore also the concepts were stunted, unilateral, abstract, lifeless, and utopian.
15. We do not affirm the individual conscience bare, not the face socio-political, not selfish or altruistic, not the form or abstraction, but rather the human personality living. This is not created in selfishness or altruism. Slips not in any abstract context. At its base is the instinct of immortality, thrust into a life eternal and creativity. It grows up to in his creative powers and immortality that is manifested in the cosmos. The new concept must not disclose and claim an abstraction, but the real man, living.
Man is a little ridiculous to be an all-encompassing desire for the infinite, as Kropotkin argued almost scientifically, connecting to the Copernican revolution in astronomy (the same feeling the Slavophile Danilevzkij and Spengler, who today makes so much noise). Open up great prospects ahead of the man, not as if they are never given. The struggle against death is not in principle impossible (the experiments of Steinach, Andreev, Kravvov among others). The possibility of immortality (immortality) is already without scientific basis, and the achievements of physics and technology provide the basis for the consideration of the matter scientifically cosmic (interplanetarismo.
16. The highest good is eternal life in the cosmos. The worst evil is death. We mean here the real life and real death. All other assets are included in life, every evil has its roots in death. When we can deduce the freedom from "Natural necessity" and postulated the existence eternal right of man in the Universe, the question becomes biocosmos maximum freedom and maximum personal right.
The postulate the highest good as something that must be made immediately - as a creative principle. Biocosmos of stress above all the creative moment. The personal immortality is not given, it must be fought, made, created. This is not the resistance of the losers here, as does the Bible, but the creation of those who've never been. Recovery but not creation. The same applies to the conquest of the cosmos. Immortality and interplanetary are the perfect rule, but not the last. Are stages, means the way of creating hugely wonderful. But this goal is still ahead of us and this is the most important.
Our goal (the realization of personal immortality, life in the cosmos, the resurrection) excludes a mystique that would lead to chaos and the void. This is a realistic task of consciousness. But we do not identify with the goal being to build or givenness, or should we give up freedom, creativity and personality. The
biocosmos defeats skepticism and free human creativity, to the extent that confers on it a force and an incredible powerful momentum. It is a beacon to guide men, it is the foundation and the red wire to the personal and social provisions. Only biocosmos can define and regulate the entire society.
17. The old society collapses. He lives his Indian summer, sunset
escaped the horror of the night lies ahead. Our task is to create based on the great goal of biocosmos a new life, a new being, a new culture.
Modern society (civil) leads to death, is based on death. Since man is mortal now, she considers the absolute death of the personality. It is marred by the phrase "death is inevitable." This formula has been sanctioned by religion and ancient scientific conscience. This formula has vanished from the man the spirit of outrage at the death. When the modern society conceives of death and the setting in space, provides all the ills of society. If this were to happen again humanity would be threatened by a complete physical and moral degeneration. Such a society must be destroyed from its foundations.
The company must be based on the principle of biocosmos. When a company states the fundamental right of everyone to eternal life, can not support a division into exploited and exploiters, slaves and masters. It guarantees a maximum individual development and self-esteem. It will be very smooth on the basis of the ideal of unity of its constituent parts. When ideas become biocosmos the achievements of each (the reverse is impossible) the company abandons its power, because its basic idea will be made freely by each. We affirm the unity
total about our goal. The struggle for immortality individual for life in the cosmos is the will of all. At the same time to be overcome in determining the location and time (death) space and not through individual efforts. Hence the need for social solidarity. Only unity in the great goal ensures victory over death and the cosmos. The struggle for immortality and life in the cosmos is the true basis of the new social being.
18. In the new society men do not come together on the basis of a compulsion, but because they are aware of the great common goal. A company that implements the inter-planetary and opposes the death will be affirmed in all, given that achieves the greatest good of everyone. The maximum common goal mean that we are falling back because of someone else in small places. For this loyalty to it should not be regulated by a contract (Proudhon). The individual will and the thing repeated endlessly here among fellow fighters at the same time increases the power of each individual step in the direction of biocosmos. This company is a "gun or a sword, with which you strengthen your natural strength. " We affirm the individuality as well as the community more strongly than others. The stronger the pendulum beats in one direction, the stronger is its amplitude in the other. The more we are extreme individualists, we are much more extreme to the community.
19. The new company is not aware of small communities or bands who "feel no need to expand" (Godvvin). The old injury and the wrong thinking of the small space should be thought of as an outdated throwback and a legacy of the Middle Ages. To the next level is the maximum space. The all-encompassing unity of man can achieve great ideas only in large spaces. Biocosmos The company is global and planetary.
20. The company is biocosmos its maximum freedom. The problem requires a free man disturbing. The man (mankind) had never been given much of himself as the biocosmos. Can not hope in God, life after death. He sees death in front of him like a normal reality and must fight alone without extemal aid this evil, in a real way, following a path of its own.
21. In biocosmos men join forces as partners in the struggle. The community of struggle is the opposite of brotherhood as trade relationship is not creative. In
brotherhood relations are already given, predetermined by nature, so I am not creative. In the relationship of comrades on the other hand nothing is given in advance, rather you want and it is creative. The Brotherhood is a conservative principle. In the storm of our struggle for immortality and the cosmos we do not affirm the brotherhood, but the community of struggle.
22. On the path of biocosmos we support the revolution, the action to the pathos of the revolutionary class. The biocosmos was born in the explosion of the revolution - so we are inseparably linked with the revolution, that is our strength. Biocosmos The order of things come into play after the victory of the revolution. The purpose the revolution is nell'annientamento classes, which is a vital prerequisite for the issue of global extent biocosmos is proposed. However, the maximum program biocosmos as can already be promoted unity, inspiration and victory of the revolutionary class.
23. Assuming that the state incamminerà biocosmos on the road, we put emphasis on the need for a positive relationship with the Soviet system. The Soviet state I should not be confused with the bourgeois state. On one hand, the Soviets are a necessary organization of the revolutionary struggle against the old world. On the other hand have assumed the function of fighting against nature, that embody the trend biocosmos.
During the transition period the Soviets bodies can not become full-time course of the struggle against the yoke of nature. They must fulfill the duties of the fight with the ancient world in the form of a dictatorship. Hence some constraint, but this type of constraint is completely different from that found in a bourgeois state. All charges against the state as a system of violence and oppression of individual freedom are meaningless with regard to the Soviet state. The old form was
soon be over. The new form is different for Soviet ends and means. The Soviet system, which primarily ensures the liberation of man from the yoke of external nature, now promotes awakening of consciousness, releasing the figures on the weight of tradition. As a result of Sovietization growing consciousness of human freedom and responsibility. Soviets in men are linked to each other based on the awareness that this fight requires discipline. Soviets in the men learn to respect themselves and others, while the bourgeois society, as a society of masters and slaves, excludes the necessary attention to each other.
To the extent that the victory of the revolution against the function of the old world vanish, the function of the Soviet state in the fight against the yoke of nature will gain significance. The two functions that characterize the way to the biocosmos, are close, the question of immortality and the universe must be made already now on the agenda.
(trad. it. Tristana Dini from German)
Notes
Svjagotor 1, Alexander, Doktrina otcov the anarchizim-biokosmism in Biokosmist, 3-4, Moscow 1922, p. 3-21, extracts.
DA Squad none of N 5 2010 Mimesis
0 comments:
Post a Comment